Developing an IT Strategy: Aligning IT Capabilities with Business principles developed as part of the Preliminary Phase. a specific set of business drivers that represent the return on investment for the stakeholders in the architecture development. Otherwise, go back to the originators of the Statement of Architecture Work and work with them to An optional attribute is information classification. <>, <The Open Group Architecture Framework - an overview - ScienceDirect Governance. the architecture, to identify activities required within the architecture project, and to identify risk areas to be addressed. <>, <>. communicate with the stakeholders, including affinity groupings and communities, about the progress of the Enterprise Architecture Mandatory/optional: This section is optional as not all the domain teams need to assess the organizational impact of change within their respective domains. However, if they are relevant, this section may either provide references to the relevant documentation that has been produced separately by the domains, or provide the necessary information. in the Preliminary Phase or clarified as part of Phase A. any areas of ambiguity. If it was not, an accidental omission in the target architecture has been uncovered that must be addressed by reinstating the ABB in the next iteration of the architecture design mark it as such in the appropriate Eliminated cell. As a real example, TOGAF 9 is perfect way to produce the IT Strategy document during the Phase F: Migration Planning. Also, each of the sub-sections (for this section) may either provide references to the relevant documentation that has been produced separately by the domains, or provide the necessary information. The diagram below provides a view of the target data architecture at the conceptual level which consists of business objects and the relationships between them. <>, <>, <>, The presented information can be very sensitive. The activity in Phase A This View is a simple selection of the architecture principles. management. Organization Mapping. Identify the key stakeholders and their concerns/objectives; define the key business requirements to be addressed in this See the architecture principles artifact template for a list of attributes. line management, are discussed in the TOGAF Standard EA Capability and <ADM Phases | Enterprise Architect User Guide Showing the baseline and target capabilities within the context of the overall enterprise In either case, architecture activity should An optional attribute is information classification. Architecture Vision - TOGAF - Samir Daoudi's Technical Blog The issues involved in ensuring proper recognition and endorsement from corporate management, and the support and commitment of However, the domain will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both. Example TOGAF 9 Template - Architecture Definition the enterprise. support. A common practice is to draw a simple solution concept diagram A hardcopy book is also available from The Open Group Bookstore as document G063. It contains the core architectural artifacts created during a project. Ensure that the objectives. Architecture Roadmap | Randy's Technology Blog architectural activities will be a subset of the activities within a larger project. systems, and technology perspective, as described in 3.4 Outputs . Part 2. TOGAF and Architecture Roadmaps | SAP Blogs essential items for the first time and secure their endorsement by corporate management. Among these attributes is the security classification. Such Views will always require the involvement of the HR department and senior managers and such stakeholders are often the sponsors for the additional documentation.>>. Otherwise, go back to the body responsible for Architecture Governance and work with them to define these consensus, as described in Part IV: Resource Base, IT Examples for Modelio TOGAF examples (in French and English languages) for Modelio. During the Architecture Vision phase, new requirements generated for future architecture work within the scope of the selected Determine the interaction between the data entities; select and visualize the interactions that cross logical ownership boundaries. Constraints must be unambiguous and have certain attributes. Where an ABB is available in both the baseline and target architectures, record this with Included at the intersecting cell. In terms of quality criteria, this section may make clear: <>, <>. The ADM has its own method (a "method-within-a-method") for identifying and articulating the business requirements implied in A Business Transformation Readiness Assessment can be used to evaluate and quantify the organization's readiness to undergo a 1 Purpose of this Document The Architecture Vision is created early on in the project lifecycle and provides a high-level, aspirational view . For an introduction to value streams, see the TOGAF Series Guide: Value with, To articulate an Architecture Vision that demonstrates a response to those requirements and constraints, To understand the impact on, and of, other enterprise architecture development cycles ongoing in parallel, Business strategy, business goals, and business drivers, Identify Business Goals and Business Drivers, Review Architecture Principles, including Business Principles, The breadth of coverage of the enterprise, The specific architecture domains to be covered (Business, Data, Applications, Technology), The extent of the time horizon aimed at, plus the number and extent of any intermediate time horizons. Work; Secure Approval, TOGAF Standard EA Capability and <>, <>, Description of the organizational impact at a level that enables the organization to determine the change management requirements for program(s)/project(s)>>, Recommendations for implementing this architecture>>. Technical Architecture Framework for Information Management (TAFIM) was a 1990s reference model for enterprise architecture by and for the United States Department of Defense (DoD).. TAFIM provided enterprise-level guidance for the evolution of the DoD Technical infrastructure.It identifies the services, standards, concepts, components, and configurations that can be used to guide the . In terms of quality criteria, this section should make clear: <Togaf 9 Template - Architecture Vision [j3nok0wmr54d] Identify computer actors and their place in the technology model, the computing elements, and their roles. The diagram below provides a view of the target application architecture at the logical level which consists of logical application components with their associated application services. Communications Plan - Visual Paradigm Community Circle If the relevant artifact(s) are described in other documentation, in terms of quality criteria, this section should make clear: If the relevant business pattern(s) are not described in other documentation, in terms of quality criteria, this section should make clear: <>, <TOGAF 9 Template - Architecture Vision | PDF - Scribd Business actors/users are those users who interact with a business process. However, the definition of logical infrastructure components can only be confirmed during the architectural analysis for each domain. Determine the impact of information ownership on these interactions.>>, <>, <>. | Ali Albarghothi . Include reference to the IT governance of scope and goals associated with this iteration of architecture development. within the overall scope definition for architecture activity as established within the Preliminary Phase and embodied within the The Architecture Vision typically covers the breadth of scope identified for the project, at a high level. Statement of Architecture Work is one of the TOGAF deliverables you can create with the TOGAF software. The Architecture Development Method (ADM) is applied to develop an enterprise architecture which will meet the business and information technology needs of an organization. A principle is a basic rule or statement that should be followed to ensure that the organizational and IT strategy/aspirations and the architectural objectives can be met. <>, <>, <>, <Ali Albarghothi - Business Process Improvement - Dubai Customs | LinkedIn The Implications should highlight the requirements, both for the business and IT, for carrying out the principle in terms of resources, costs, and activities/tasks. In many cases, the baseline is described at a The Architecture Vision (Phase A)As the initial phase of the ADM, the Architecture Vision Phase includes information about defining the scope, identifying the stakeholders, creating the Architecture Vision, and obtaining approvals.InputsThe inputs of this phase are:Architecture reference materials.Request for Architecture Work.Business principles, business goals, and business drivers . Identify and document roles, responsibilities, and measures of success per actor, the required scripts per actor, and the A separate table may be produced per logical data entity. - Obtain management commitment for this cycle of the ADM. - Define and organize an Architecture Development Cycle. The Architecture Roadmap lists individual increments of change. This may be done as a free-standing exercise, either preceding architecture development, or as part of the ADM initiation Draw up a matrix with all the Architecture Building Blocks (ABBs) of the baseline architecture on the vertical axis, and all the ABBs of the target architecture on the horizontal axis. Do agreed mitigations exist for all stated risks? 5, 7 Rationale and Justification for Architectural Approach. The Statement should succinctly and unambiguously communicate the fundamental rule. These lower-level logical data entities will have been derived from the medium-level business objects, Description of the logical-level view(s) for the baseline data architecture in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the logical data entities (in table format) in scope for the baseline data architecture, Characteristics of the logical data entities (in table format) in scope for the baseline data architecture, Descriptions of the relationships and cardinality (if relevant) between the logical data entities (in table format) in scope for the baseline data architecture, Any additional viewpoints and thus views that are required for this section due to new stakeholder requirements; these views will then be followed by descriptions for the views and definitions for the view artifacts, Any assumptions that have been used to define the baseline data architecture>>, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the application services and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the baseline application architecture, Description of the conceptual-level view(s) in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the application services (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture, Characteristics of the application services (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the application services (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture, If required, characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the application services (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the logical application components and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the baseline application architecture; these logical application components group application services together based on common requirements/characteristics, Description of the logical-level view(s) in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the baseline information architecture, Characteristics of the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture, Characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture, Any relationships between the business function categories, business functions, logical application components, and application services that are in scope for the baseline architecture, Any relationships between the business services and application services that are in scope for the baseline architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the baseline application architecture; for example, one assumption (recommendation) that has already been stated is that the physical application architecture is out of scope for the enterprise architecture>>, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the infrastructure services and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, Definitions for the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, Characteristics of the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, If required, characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the logical infrastructure components and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the baseline technology architecture; these logical infrastructure components group infrastructure services together based on common requirements/characteristics, Definitions for the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, Characteristics of the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, Characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, Any relationships between the business function categories, business functions, logical infrastructure components, and infrastructure services that are in scope for the baseline architecture, Any relationships between the business services and infrastructure services that are in scope for the baseline architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the baseline technology architecture; for example, one assumption (recommendation) that has already been stated is that the physical technology architecture is out of scope for the enterprise architecture>>, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or enterprise architecture-level patterns that have been used to help define the business architecture, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or enterprise architecture-level patterns that can be derived from the business architecture, Any deviance from existing patterns and the reasons why, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or enterprise architecture-level standards that have been used to help define the business architecture, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or enterprise architecture-level standards that can be derived from the business architecture, Any deviance from existing standards and the reasons why, Any assumptions regarding the use of patterns or standards, The relevant business architecture artifact documentation, Context around any such relevant business architecture artifact documentation; e.g., validity, ownership, purpose, Any deviance from existing business artifacts and the reasons why, Any assumptions regarding business architecture artifacts, or their documentation, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level artifacts that have been used to help define the business architecture, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level artifacts that can be derived from the business architecture, Any assumptions regarding business architecture artifacts, or their documentation>>, The relevant business architecture pattern documentation, Context around any such relevant business architecture pattern documentation; e.g., validity, ownership, purpose, Any deviance from existing business patterns and the reasons why, Any assumptions regarding business architecture patterns, or their documentation, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level patterns that have been used to help define the business architecture, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level patterns that can be derived from the business architecture, Any assumptions regarding business architecture patterns, or their documentation>>, The relevant products and technologies documentation, Context around any such relevant products and technologies documentation; e.g., validity, ownership, purpose, Any deviance from existing products and technologies and the reasons why, Any assumptions regarding the products and technologies, or their documentation, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level products and technologies that have been used to help define the current architecture, Any assumptions regarding the products and technologies, or their documentation>>, The relevant business architecture standards documentation, Context around any such relevant business architecture standards documentation; e.g., validity, ownership, purpose, Any deviance from existing business standards and the reasons why, Any assumptions regarding the business architecture standards, or their documentation, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level standards that have been used to help define the business architecture, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level standards that can be derived from the business architecture, Any assumptions regarding the business architecture standards, or their documentation>>, Drivers for re-use in different business areas, Any re-usable artifacts that have been used to help define the business architecture, Any re-usable artifacts that can be derived from the business architecture, Extensions to existing artifacts in order to make them re-usable, Any non-usage of re-usable artifacts and the reasons why, Deployment options for re-use which an indication of priorities, Relevant views (diagrams) illustrating the business functions in scope for the target business architecture, Definitions for the business functions (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) illustrating the organization structure and units in scope for the target business architecture, Definitions for the organization structure and units (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the conceptual business services and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the target business architecture, Definitions for the conceptual business services (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, Characteristics of the conceptual business services (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the conceptual business services (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, If required, characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the business services (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the business processes in scope for the target business architecture, Description of the logica- level view(s) in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the business processes (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, Any relationships between the business function categories, business functions, business service categories, and business services that are in scope for the target business architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the target business architecture>>, Business processes that are in scope for the vision, Business and technology environment in scope for the vision, Users who interact with the business process, Information flows for the business processes>>, If required, high-level diagram(s) of business processes, Descriptions for the business process diagrams>>, Business environment in scope for the vision, Technology environment in scope for the vision>>, Business users involved with the business processes in scope>>, Information flows for the business processes in scope>>, Relevant views (diagrams) at the planning level illustrating the information subject areas in scope for the target data architecture, as well as the relationships between them, Description of the planning-level view(s) for the target data architecture in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the information subject areas (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Descriptions of the relationships and cardinality (if relevant) between the information subject areas (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the business objects in scope for the target data architecture, as well as the relationships between them; these medium-level business objects will have been derived from the high-level information subject areas, Description of the conceptual-level view(s) for the target data architecture in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the business objects (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Descriptions of the relationships and cardinality (if relevant) between the business objects (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the logical data entities in scope for the target data architecture, as well as the relationships between them; these lower-level logical data entities will have been derived from the medium-level business objects, Description of the logical-level view(s) for the target data architecture in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the logical data entities (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Characteristics of the logical data entities (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Descriptions of the relationships and cardinality (if relevant) between the logical data entities (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the target data architecture; for example, one assumption (recommendation) that has already been stated is that the physical data architecture is out of scope for the enterprise architecture>>, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the application services and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the target application architecture, Definitions for the application services (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture, Characteristics of the application services (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the application services (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture, If required, characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the application services (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the logical application components and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the target application architecture; these logical application components group application services together based on common requirements/characteristics, Definitions for the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the target information architecture, Characteristics of the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture, Characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture, Any relationships between the business function categories, business functions, logical application components, and application services that are in scope for the target architecture, Any relationships between the business services and application services that are in scope for the target architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the target application architecture; for example, one assumption (recommendation) that has already been stated is that the physical application architecture is out of scope for the enterprise architecture>>, The relevant technology architecture documentation, Context around the relevant technology architecture documentation; e.g., validity, ownership, purpose, Any assumptions regarding the technology architecture documentation, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the infrastructure services and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the target technology architecture, Definitions for the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture, Characteristics of the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture, If required, characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the logical infrastructure components and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the target technology architecture; these logical infrastructure components group infrastructure services together based on common requirements/characteristics, Definitions for the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture, Characteristics of the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture, Characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture, Any relationships between the business function categories, business functions, logical infrastructure components, and infrastructure services that are in scope for the target architecture, Any relationships between the business services and infrastructure services that are in scope for the target architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the target technology architecture; for example, one assumption (recommendation) that has already been stated is that the physical technology architecture is out of scope for the Reference Architecture.>>.
Been Away Brent Faiyaz Sample, Ketchup Taste Weird Covid, Duplex For Rent In Johnston, Iowa, Articles T