No violation of Equal Pay Act where Agency established that the Agency-wide salary increases and the performance-based salary increase system were gender-neutral factors, were applied consistently, and explain any compensation disparity between Complainant and her male coworkers. This resulted in an award of $15,000 in non-pecuniary damages as the agency claimed that Padilla had not experienced any long-term mental or physical illness nor any emotional harm. In order to have met the federal 2% participation rate goal, 14,158 IWTD were needed. Postal Service who was subjected to a hostile work environment for over three years and then removed. Substantial evidence supported Administrative Judge's determination that the Agency discriminated against Complainant on the basis of race when it terminated his employment as a sales store checker during his probationary period; the AJ found Complainant to be credible, the Agency's stated reason (that Complainant had an altercation with a bagger) was not believable, the evidence showed that those terminated during their probationary period were predominantly African-Americans, and a Caucasian employee who also had an altercation with the bagger did not receive any disciplinary action. A class actioncomplaintfor injured on duty postal employees was certified by an EEOC Administrative Judge (AJ) on May 30,2008. 0120170676 (Oct. 31, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120170676.pdf. Brenton W. v. Dep't of Justice, EEOC Appeal No. Alonzo N. v. Dep't of Homeland Security, EEOC Appeal No. Applying Bostock v. Clayton County, 140 S. Ct. 1831 (2020), the Commission found that the agency discriminated against complainant on the basis of sexual orientation when it did not select him for any of three supervisory positions; complainant established that the agency's proffered explanation was pretextual. 2020004360 and 2020004343 (Nov. 4, 2020), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2020_12_07/2020004360-2020004343.pdf. On September 1, 2022 Arbitrator Joseph M. Sharnoff issued his latest national-level RI-399 award, this one concerning the Automated Delivery Unit Sorter (ADUS). First time EEO efile user? 4~I1i.#3S*S6SS2+V18gtdm$0^FA !HS4$0I@T1 6 An EEOC Administrative Judge has approved a settlement in the Pittman v. USPS Class Complaint in which the complaint alleged discrimination based on disability against a class of employees in permanent rehabilitation positions, on a nation-wide basis. Costs USPS agreed to pay $840,044 for 4,584 pre-complaint settlements, of which 433 were monetary settlements averaging $1,940. A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States. The complainants own testimony, along with the circumstances of a particular case, can suffice to sustain his burden in this regard. Phyllis F. v. Dep't of Homeland Security, EEOC Appeal No. 2019002318 (Apr. 0120180137 (Apr. We are looking for people who may have been affected by the unlawful discrimination alleged in these suits. Washington, DC 20507 Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 2019001468 (June 5, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/2019001468.pdf. Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. 0120162314 (June 5, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120162314.txt. During the coming weeks, we will not only be analyzing the spreadsheet for the Agency's compliance with the Judge's Order, but we will also be supplementing the spreadsheet with the information the EEOC has asked us to compile. Share sensitive v. United States Postal Service an AJ decision certified the following class: Malinda F. v. Dep't of the Air Force, EEOC Appeal No. USPS Settlement An EEOC Administrative Judge has approved a settlement in the Pittman v. USPS Class Complaint in which the complaint alleged discrimination based on disability against a class of employees in permanent rehabilitation positions, on a nation-wide basis. For Deaf/Hard of Hearing callers: 131 M Street, NE 0120123215 and 0120131079 (Mar. Can I be reinstated to my USPS job now while this relief process is ongoing? According to the US Labor Department, postal workers accounted for only one-fifth of all federal employees in 2019, yet were disproportionately injured on the job, experiencing half of all workplace illness and injuries among federal employees. Agency violated the Rehabilitation Act when it placed Complainant's private medical documents in his Employee Work Folder, a non-medical work file. The Postal Service and Postal Inspection Service appropriately addressed all workplace violence cases in the six selected districts reviewed. hb```,,K@( 0 It experienced five straight years of operating losses between 20112016 with the majority of its deficit coming from $5.8 billion in accruals of unpaid mandatory retiree health insurance payments. 0120171405 (Mar. Complainant's request for default judgment granted where Agency did not issue its final decision until 210 days after Administrative Judge's order remanding the complaint to Agency for a final decision and Agency provided no explanation for its significant delay. Eleni M. v. Dep't of Transportation, EEOC Appeal No. She further alleged the USPS retaliated against her for prior EEO action from 2005-2006. Workers in the class action suit claim that this is false and that other workers had to speed up to cover their heavy workloads after they were fired. Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. . 2021001514 (June 28, 2021), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_08_31/2021001514.pdf. Deandre C. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, EEOC Appeal No. For Deaf/Hard of Hearing callers: When determining an award of non-pecuniary compensatory damages, the Commission may consider the present-day value of comparable awards. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) discrimination allegations. In 2009, an administrative judge awarded back pay with interest and $100,000 in compensatory damages. The complainant, a federal employee at the United States Postal Service, filed an EEO complaint against the USPS. It is by no accident that our craft is taking positive strides. The plight of USPS workers bears striking similarities to the experience of workers at tech and logistics giant Amazon, owned by ultra-billionaire Jeff Bezos, who are routinely victimized, harassed, spied upon, fired and denied workers compensation for injuries suffered on the job. Ramon L. v. Dep't of Justice, EEOC Appeal No. usps eeoc settlements 2020aiken county sc register of deeds usps eeoc settlements 2020 The reissued Postal Service's Policy on Workplace Harassment is available on the Postal Service PolicyNet website: n Go to blue.usps.gov. Bernardo C. v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Appeal No. 0720160021 (July 25, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0720160021.txt. Colby S. v. Dep't of the Treasury, EEOC Appeal No. Record was insufficient to determine whether Agency jointly employed Complainant where record did not contain the contract between the Agency and staffing firm, Complainant's position description, or any evidence regarding the day-to-day actions, duties, and responsibilities of Complainant's job. In total, the EEOC received 46,158 Title VII charges in 2020 and was able to reach a settlement on 7.3% or 3,603 of those charges. Barbara S. v. U.S. Sonia B. v. Tennessee Valley Authority, EEOC Appeal No. There is no way currently for us to get you back in your position until the EEOC Administrative Judge issues an order. Cox filed another EEO complaint of discrimination which is still pending. The Agency did not make a good-faith effort to accommodate Complainant's request not to work on Sundays where supervisor did not explore any type of accommodation and there was no indication whether it would be feasible to ask other employees to volunteer to work on Sundays. Agency denied Complainant a reasonable accommodation for his hearing disability when it did not provide a sign language interpreter during training and safety meetings; where the physical safety of employees in the workplace is the subject of discussion, it is uniquely pressing for Complainant to have access to the information being conveyed. Administrative Judge's remedial order requiring Agency to develop and adopt policies and procedures concerning the recruitment and selection of employees for non-competitive, temporary positions and to ensure equal opportunity and consideration in the selection process was appropriate. The settlement provided that USPS will pay, in full settlement of all claims in this Case: The total sum of three-million-eight-hundred-fifty-thousand-dollars ($3,850,000) 14, 2021), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_06_08/2020002285.pdf. Agency's final decisions on disputed claims for individual relief were premature because an Administrative Judge retains jurisdiction and is responsible for resolving disputed claims for individual relief. %PDF-1.6 % Washington, DC 20507 Agency violated the Rehabilitation Act when it did not provide Complainant with adequate equipment and unreasonably delayed the provision of assistive technology, software, and training to support her accommodation of full-time telework; performance counseling memorandum and placement on performance improvement plan for performance issues directly resulted from Agency's failure to provide Complainant with adequate technologies required to telework effectively. 25, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120170498.pdf. The EEOC recently awarded $165,000 in non-pecuniary damages for pain and suffering to an employee of the U.S. Administrative Judge properly sanctioned Complainant, by cancelling the hearing and remanding the complaint to the Agency for a final decision, when Complainant failed to abide by the AJ's order to remove video depositions of management officials from YouTube and to provide written confirmation that he had done so. 536 0 obj <>stream The complainant worked at the United States Postal Service (USPS). The government-wide average was 344 days. Complainant did not establish an Equal Pay Act violation where he and his female comparator performed substantially different jobs in two different locations, they were supervised under different management chains, the female comparator used more complex technology, and she had been paid at a higher level prior to receiving a lateral transfer. 26, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120172637.pdf. info@eeoc.gov Velva B. v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal Nos. We wanted to reach out and give a quick update on the case, and answer some questions that have been raised. The lies to protect themselves is mind boggling. Reita M. v. Agency for International Development, EEOC Appeal No. Agency did not show that allowing Complainant to take Saturdays off for religious observances would have resulted in an undue hardship where Agency asserted that it could not do so without incurring overtime costs but made no effort to look into the possibility of schedule swaps or any other type of accommodation. The appellate decision affirmed an Administrative Judge's award of $200,000.00 in non-pecuniary compensatory damages and $223,116.35 in pecuniary compensatory damages. 0720180015 (Nov. 15, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0720180015.pdf. Republican President Donald Trump has unleashed new threats to privatize the USPS in recent years, against which thousands of postal workers in cities across the US protested in 2018. 19), the U.S. The EEOC reopened and found that the Postal Service had not fully complied with its previous orders.. You do what they say, not what they do. 0120161851 (June 15, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120161851.txt. Class members include individuals with disabilities in permanent rehabilitation positions who allegedly had their duty hours restricted between March 24, 2000 and December 31, 2012. If it is found that you meet the legal criteria for reinstatement, the Judge can order USPS to give you back the job you held before the NRP. The Administrative Judge's denial of class certification was appropriate where the putative class agent failed to establish that the class met the commonality, typicality, and adequacy of representation requirements. Interest on back pay is not available in federal-sector complaints under the ADEA. Postal workers in the US and worldwide cannot allow their struggles to be trapped within the realm of the labor unions and capitalist parties any longer. Agency violated the Rehabilitation Act when, after Complainant's physician provided a medical report stating that Complainant's borderline Type II Diabetes Mellitus did not require medication and did not impair his ability to do his job as a Court Security Officer, Agency requested at least 11 additional types of medical information and examinations; a mere diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus does not automatically mean that an agency has a job-related, business-necessity-based reason for subjecting CSOs to disability-related inquiries and medical examinations. workers that this case involved. Administrative Judge properly determined that, where Complainant (through a retainer agreement) was being provided legal services at a reduced rate based on public-interest-minded reasons, the proper hourly rate was the prevailing rate at the time of the fee petition rather than the historical rate at the time the work was performed. Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. USPS employee wins discrimination and harassment claim with the EEOC. Harlan P. v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Request No. 012082505, Agency Case No. Edward W. v. Social Security Admin., EEOC Appeal No. 0120170498 (Apr. Under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Gabriele G. v. Social Security Administration, EEOC Appeal No. 2019003996 (May 24, 2021), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_06_08/2019003996.pdf. American Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO Mae P. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, EEOC Appeal No. Frequently Asked Questions, Commissioner Charges and Directed Investigations, Office of Civil Rights, Diversity and Inclusion, Management Directives & Federal Sector Guidance, Federal Sector Alternative Dispute Resolution, Decision to File Complaint Pending at End of Fiscal Year, Completed/Ended Counselings/Complaint Closures, All Pre-Complaint Counselings (minus remands). Employers paid more than $439 million to resolve U.S. Update: McConnell vs USPS NRP EEOC Class Action Lawsuit, nrpclassaction@theemploymentattorneys.com, Syracuse NY Postal Carrier Charged with Discarding Mail, Kubayanda Resumes Role as Postal Regulatory Commission Chairman, Florida Postal Clerk Sentenced To Prison For Stealing Mail, Passport Applications To Commit Bank Fraud, Nebraska man gets prison for impersonating USPS Postal Inspector, U.S. 0120182681 (Dec. 27, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120182681.pdf. Share sensitive The U.S. 0120171387 (May 2, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120171387.pdf. 0120170218 (Dec. 21, 2017), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120170218.txt. An Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) administrative judge may suspend a hearing to allow the parties to settle a case and will accept a settlement to resolve the case at any time before a final decision is reached. Carriers also risk injury from lifting heavy bins, squatting, repeatedly getting in and out of mail trucks, walking up and down stairs, and walking to deliver mail in inclement weather, putting them at greater risk for slips and falls as well as joint injuries. 2019004326 (Sept. 30, 2020), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2020_12_07/2019004326.pdf. Sheila D. v. Dep't of Veterans Affairs, EEOC Petition No. *Includes only complaints filed in FY 2009 where counseling was also completed during FY 2009. Moreover, some EEO complaints dated back as far as 2001. Complainant awarded $75,000 in non-pecuniary compensatory damages where nearly two years of sexual harassment caused embarrassment and humiliation, triggered daily headaches and weekly migraines, and resulted in a diagnosis of anxiety. Robin H. v. Environmental Protection Agency, EEOC Appeal No. Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. Mail sorters must routinely squat and lift heavy bins of mail over 70 pounds, which can cause knee, back and rotator cuff injuries. We are dedicated to achieving the best results for you in this case, and we will not let the USPS game of dragging this process out free them from their legal obligations. A lock ( The Commission declined to review the award of $54,403.80 for reimbursement of Padillas withdrawal of funds from his Thrift Savings Plan account to support himself following his removal as neither party challenged this award on appeal. In 2021, we reported that non-career employees' turnover and injury rates were higher than career rates, both before and after we controlled for numerous factors such as employee tenure. 0120162182 (Dec. 8, 2017), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120162182.txt. Summary judgment in favor of Agency appropriate where there were no genuine issues of material fact or credibility that merited a hearing; record showed that Agency issued Complainant a Letter of Counseling because of allegations that he had used improper language of a vulgar or sexual nature and that Agency discharged him during his probationary period due to his repeated discourteous behavior; Complainant provided no evidence that raised a genuine issue of material fact that any of his protected bases played a role in the Agency's actions. The EEOC . However, some of the funds were held back to ensure that all affected clerks would receive back pay. 0120162491 (July 25, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120162491.pdf. Alena C. v. Dep't of State, EEOC Appeal No. o o o o O o o O o tri 6 > CD o O o e o o o o o o o Q o o o O o o o o O o Merit resolutions refers to charges that are resolved in the agency's administrative process (pre-litigation) in favor of the individual who filed the charge. Genny L. v. Dep't of Defense, EEOC Appeal No. The reduction in attorney fees indicates the importance of a timely submitted detailed fee petition for attorney fees and expenses, including a printout of the time and costs incurred, the services rendered, and a sworn affidavit setting forth justification for the attorneys requested hourly rate(s), fees and costs. In January 2016, the Postal Service paid $40.2 million to employees; however, it subsequently notified the APWU of errors in these initial payments. The EEOC then awarded her an additional $10,000 in non-pecuniary damages. 0120161608 (July 17, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120161608.txt. Equal Employment Opportunity ("EEO") complaint with the Postal Service on November 7, 2002. Secure .gov websites use HTTPS 1-800-669-6820 (TTY) Class members should expect to receive written notice concerning the claim procedure within the next month. Official websites use .gov Many noteworthy federal appellate decisions are frequently used as a part of the Commission's outreach and training efforts. 2021001733 (June 2, 2021), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_08_31/2021001733.pdf. Of the agencies completing 25 or more investigations, the Tennessee Valley Authority had the lowest average of 100 days. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) charged in a lawsuitthat Eclipse Advantage, Inc., violated federal law by subjecting an African-American employee to racial discrimination and retaliation at its Aldi Food Service warehouse in Hinckley, Ohio. The grievances expressed in the lawsuit are the result of the subordination of the US Postal Service to the relentless demands of the capitalist profit system in which it operates, and these conditions cannot be eliminated for all workers through the capitalist legal system. Agency erroneously dismissed complaint for failure to cooperate; the name of the alleged discriminating official and the time frame during which the alleged discrimination occurred constituted sufficient information for the Agency to complete its investigation without an affidavit from Complainant. Letter of Caution's reference to an EEO settlement and Complainant's claim of discrimination constituted per se reprisal; references to Complainant's EEO activity in a disciplinary context could reasonably have a chilling effect on the use of the EEO complaint process. v. Megan J. Brennan, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, EEOC Case No. An average out of court settlement is about $40,000. The USPS now employs around 630,000 workers compared to 900,000 in 1999. 0720170034 (June 15, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0720170034.txt. information only on official, secure websites. 12, 2021), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_06_08/2019005682.pdf. Official websites use .gov When the Merit Systems Protection Board dismisses a case for lack of jurisdiction, the matter is no longer a mixed case and should be remanded to the agency for further processing as a non-mixed complaint. She alleged discrimination based on race, national origin, and sex. She alleged that the USPS has subjected her to disability discrimination and harassment. Stefan C. v. Dep't of Homeland Security, EEOC Appeal No. What Hasn't Been Working Well Imagine the EEOC ruling against you in a discrimination charge and inviting you to a settlement conference without explaining either why you lost the case or how [] Former USPS workers in the NRP class action suit allege that they were discriminated against after showing proof that they had been injured at work. 2019005957 (Apr. 2020), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_04_05/2019005824%20DEC.pdf. Serita B. v. Dep't of the Army, EEOC Appeal No. The Agency, which first denied Complainant's request for an ergonomically correct chair and then provided her with a chair that did not fit her needs, denied Complainant a reasonable accommodation; the Agency should have worked with Complainant to conduct an individualized ergonomic assessment that would have determined her specific needs. Padilla v. USPS, EEOC Appeal No. Irvin M. v. Dep't of Homeland Security, EEOC Appeal No. The government-wide average was 344 days. Dickerson v. Potter The majority of cases, about 67 percent, are ruled in the plaintiff's favor when taken to litigation. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's (EEOC) Office of Federal Operations (OFO) is issuing the following instructions regarding the processing of federal sector EEO complaints covered by 29 CFR Part 1614. 529 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<1FB7EE72CCD9854B90DCFC8A33497EB8><1B534663FC186A42AEFC8BA0152CE4CF>]/Index[511 26]/Info 510 0 R/Length 94/Prev 400457/Root 512 0 R/Size 537/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream He was a part of the 130000 In recent decades, the USPS has faced enormous funding cuts. Complainant established a prima facie case of age discrimination, and Agency did not meet its burden of production to articulate a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for not selecting Complainant for a supervisory position; stating that a complainant was not selected because she received a lower score than the selectees does not meet an agencys burden of production, unless the agency explains the specific reasoning for the score. Administrative Judge should not have sanctioned Agency for holding a fact-finding conference where legal counsel for Agency and Complainant were allowed to ask follow-up questions after EEO Investigator questioned witnesses; EEO MD-110 language permitting an EEO Investigator to be a "presiding official at a fact-finding conference" anticipates that parties may ask questions, and the fact-finding conference transcript showed that Agency counsel did not direct, control, interfere with, or overrule the investigator. Complainant not entitled to award of Thrift Savings Plan reimbursements where there was no evidence that she participated in the program. No. Calvin D. v. Dep't of the Army, EEOC Petition No. The EEOC concluded that the employee demonstrated that the Postal Service reasons for its actions were more than likely a pretext for reprisal discrimination and that the award of $40,000 was consistent with the amounts awarded in similar cases. Rick G. v. Dep't of Homeland Security, EEOC Appeal No. I am a member of this class action. The lawsuit also alleges that workers were fired after being moved to less physically demanding jobs, even if they provided written instructions to human resources from medical professionals restricting the type of work they were able to safely perform with their conditions. Tanya P. v. United States Postal Service, EEOC Appeal No. The EEOC ordered the Postal Service to notify each class member, within 10 calendar days, of the EEOC decision. 0120180739 (June 21, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120180739.pdf. 0120161068 (Mar. USPS workers have had their jobs and living standards under attack since the 1970s as a massive shift of wealth from the working class to the corporate ruling class was underway. 0120180568 (Apr. In our continuing commitment to require postal managements compliance with the August 2016 arbitration decision rendered by national arbitrator Shyam (This article first appeared in the January/February 2021 issue of the American Postal Worker magazine) The best way to provide this information is to email us at nrpclassaction@theemploymentattorneys.com. The Agency articulated a legitimate reason for disciplining Complainant, but it did not explain why other employees who engaged in similar behavior were not disciplined. 19, 2021), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_04_30/2021001898.pdf. 0120161017 (May 29, 2018), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120161017.txt. Agency discriminatorily denied Complainant's religious-accommodation request for an exemption from the requirement that employees carry a cannister of pepper spray where it was undisputed that Complainant, a chaplain, had a bona fide religious belief that prevented him from carrying the spray; Agency did not show that exempting one employee, out of approximately 300 employees, from the requirement would have been an undue hardship; and there was no evidence that Agency explored a lateral transfer to a different facility or any other alternative accommodation. LockA locked padlock That number includes both private sector and state and local . 2020001428 (Aug. 13, 2020), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2020_12_07/2020001428.pdf. Agency failed to take prompt and effective action to address Complainant's claim of sexual harassment; a supervisor's fear of retaliation by his or her superior is an insufficient argument for failing to take action as a supervisor. International Committee of the Fourth International. Update: McConnell vs USPS NRP EEOC Class Action Lawsuit Posted on December 14, 2020 by postal A class action complaint for injured on duty postal employees was certified by an EEOC Administrative Judge (AJ) on May 30,2008. Agency's final order adopting Administrative Judge's decision vacated, and case remanded to Agency for reissuance of final order, where Complainant did not receive the AJ's decision and therefore was unable to argue with specificity about the AJ's findings and conclusions that the Agency implemented. Agency defense counsel may assist agency management officials and witnesses in the preparation of their affidavits during the investigative stage but may not instruct officials to make statements that are untrue or make changes to any affidavit without the affiant's approval of such changes; agency defense counsel also may assist agencies in informal resolution talks during the counseling stage so long as counsel suggests, but does not dictate, settlement terms. 5, 2020), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2020_08_10/0120180519.pdf. 48-1 40-0062-06, the final agency decision (FAD) issued in connection We notified the Judge about this, and argued that this is yet another reason to move this process toward a quick resolution. Ashlee P. v. Social Security Administration, EEOC Appeal No. 2022_11_29_Ordr_Prdc_UntimelinessSprdsht_Redacted.pdf, Motion to Clarify or Supplement (11.15.22) (as filed)_Redacted.pdf, 2022 11-3 Order Following Conference_Redacted.pdf, Copyright United States Postal Service 2019. We have presented the Judge with many options on ways to quickly move the relief process forward, and we continue to do everything we can to help get relief into your hands. USPS' average time for completing an investigation was 113 days. 0120181309 (Aug. 30, 2019), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/migrated_files/decisions/0120181309.pdf. Complainant not entitled to personal relief for discriminatory non-selection where substantial evidence of record supported Administrative Judge's conclusion that Agency canceled the selection process because of a violation of the collective bargaining agreement and would not have selected Complainant for the position absent the discrimination. 2020002082 (Sept. 15, 2020), https://www.eeoc.gov/sites/default/files/decisions/2021_01_19/2020002082.pdf. Of the 3,014 completed investigations, 99.2% were timely. Annalee D. v. General Services Administration, EEOC Request No.
Xml Injector Version 2 Sims 4, James Buchanan Siblings, Mobile Homes For Rent Seagoville, Tx, Persona Q2 Persona List, Steve Johnson Development Scottsdale, Az, Articles U